Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Consumer Culture
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amy-Chinn, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

This is just for me(n)

How the regulation of post-feminist lingerie advertising perpetuates woman as object

Dee Amy-Chinn

Oxford Brookes University, UK

This article argues that the official process by which advertising is regulated in the UK, when applied to the advertising of women's underwear, restricts and undermines, rather than encourages, attempts to renegotiate the discourse that surrounds the representation of women in advertising, particularly when it seeks to construct a discourse that questions the centrality of men to female sexual pleasure. This process judges ads on the basis of whether they are likely to cause ‘serious or widespread offence’. The regulators' interpretation of this ensures that lingerie advertising that represents women as objects for the male gaze remains acceptable, as do ads in which women are deliberately offering up a sexualized self-presentation, while images that seek to negotiate a discourse outside a heterosexuality governed by the coital imperative are considered problematic. This encourages the perpetuation of a conservative framework in which women can be viewed as objects rather than subjects.

Key Words: ASA • gaze • Gossard • heterosexuality • offence • underwear • Wonderbra

Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 6, No. 2, 155-175 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1469540506064742


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
R. Gill
Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2008; 18(1): 35 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Media Culture SocietyHome page
D. Amy-Chinn
Regulating against offence: lessons from the field of UK advertising
Media Culture Society, November 1, 2007; 29(6): 1036 - 1048.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
D. Amy-Chinn, C. Jantzen, and P. Ostergaard
Doing and meaning: Towards an integrated approach to the study of women's relationship to underwear
Journal of Consumer Culture, November 1, 2006; 6(3): 379 - 401.
[Abstract] [PDF]