This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Shove, E. Articles by Pantzar, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Consumers, Producers and Practices

Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking

Lancaster University, e.shove{at}lancaster.ac.uk

Mika Pantzar

National Consumer Research Centre, Finland, mika.pantzar{at}ncrc.fi

The idea that artifacts are acquired and used in the course of accomplishing social practices has important implications for theories of consumption and innovation. From this point of view, it is not enough to show that goods are symbolically and materially positioned, mediated and filtered through existing cultures and conventions. Twisting the problem around, the further challenge is to explain how practices change and with what consequence for the forms of consumption they entail. In this article, we suggest that new practices like Nordic walking, a form of ‘speed walking’ with two sticks, arise through the active and ongoing integration of images, artifacts and forms of competence, a process in which both consumers and producers are involved. While it makes sense to see Nordic walking as a situated social practice, such a view makes it difficult to explain its growing popularity in countries as varied as Japan, Norway and the USA. In addressing this issue, we conclude that practices and associated cultures of consumption are always ‘homegrown’. Necessary and sometimes novel ingredients (including images and artifacts) may circulate widely, but they are always pieced together in a manner that is informed by previous and related practice. What looks like the diffusion of Nordic walking is therefore better understood as its successive, but necessarily localized, (re)invention. In developing this argument, we explore some of the consequences of conceptualizing consumption and consumer culture as the outcome of meaningful social practice.

Key Words: consumption • innovation • practice • walking

Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 5, No. 1, 43-64 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1469540505049846


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Gregson, A. Metcalfe, and L. Crewe Practices of Object Maintenance and Repair: How consumers attend to consumer objects within the home Journal of Consumer Culture, July 1, 2009; 9(2): 248 - 272. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Araujo, H. Kjellberg, and R. Spencer Market practices and forms: introduction to the special issue Marketing Theory, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 5 - 14. [PDF]

				M. Watson and E. Shove Product, Competence, Project and Practice: DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 69 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Cochoy Calculation, qualculation, calqulation: shopping cart arithmetic, equipped cognition and the clustered consumer Marketing Theory, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 15 - 44. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Trentmann Citizenship and consumption Journal of Consumer Culture, July 1, 2007; 7(2): 147 - 158. [PDF]

				C. Gronroos On defining marketing: finding a new roadmap for marketing Marketing Theory, December 1, 2006; 6(4): 395 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Gronroos Adopting a service logic for marketing Marketing Theory, September 1, 2006; 6(3): 317 - 333. [Abstract] [PDF]