This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ilmonen, K. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Use of and Commitment to Goods

University of Jyväskylä Ilmonen{at}yfi.jyu.fi

In social theory, goods have usually not been included in the social world. However, in the sociology of consumption, they have been seen as mediating social relations and offering opportunities to make social distinctions. It is precisely the symbolic aspect of goods that makes this possible. In helping to make these distinctions, goods are only given a passive role in our lives. They only get to function as markers of social differences, tastes, and so on. However, the use value of goods cannot be reduced to their symbolic aspect. Generally speaking, the use value also has two other aspects which I will call the ‘functionality’ and ‘productivity’ of goods. I am going to argue that because goods also comprise these aspects, they are not just ‘dead’ or ‘asocial’ elements or phenomena in our everyday lives, but also play an active role in our relationship to other people. Moreover, I will pay attention to the process of appropriating goods. On the one hand, I will focus on how we internalize purchased commodities (i.e. how we make them our possessions in the social meaning of the word); and, on the other hand, I shall also draw attention to the ways in which we surround our goods with the aura of ‘me-ness’ (i.e. how we externalize them). I will then conclude by looking at the active role that goods play as our partners when we try to cope with everyday life. They are ‘something in order to’, as Heidegger puts it. We are therefore prone to treat them well,‘to take care of them’, and they may have an even more important role in our lives than is usually thought.

Key Words: appropriation process • externalization • functionality of goods • internalization • ‘me–ness’ • object-centred sociality

Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 4, No. 1, 27-50 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1469540504040903


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Sanders "Late" Capital: Amusement and Contradiction in the Contemporary Funeral Industry Crit Sociol, July 1, 2009; 35(4): 447 - 470. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Hand and E. Shove Condensing Practices: Ways of living with a freezer Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2007; 7(1): 79 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Luthar Remembering socialism: On desire, consumption and surveillance Journal of Consumer Culture, July 1, 2006; 6(2): 229 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Shove and M. Pantzar Consumers, Producers and Practices: Understanding the invention and reinvention of Nordic walking Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2005; 5(1): 43 - 64. [Abstract] [PDF]