Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Consumer Culture
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tulloch, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lupton, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Consuming Risk, Consuming Science

The case of GM foods

John Tulloch

Cardiff University, Wales and Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia, jtulloch.csu.edu.au

Deborah Lupton

Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia, dlupton{at}csu.edu.au

This article presents some findings from a study investigating notions of risk among Britons, with a focus on interviewees working as professionals in high technology (high-tech) or science industries. The discussion examines our interviewees’ responses to risks related to the consumption of genetically modified (GM) food. Our study sought to elicit personal experiences as part of an individual biography of risk which included specific concerns about food consumption as part of an ‘everyday’ set of risk perceptions. We found that many interviewees enjoyed adopting a ‘scientific knowledge’ identity in the interview, emphasizing seeking ‘fact’ about the risk associated with GM foods from a wide range of media ‘opinion’, and were confident about their own ability to control most risks. However, they also constructed a ‘two nations’ view of a knowledge-based economy, involving a disparity between ‘haves’ (themselves) and others, generally because of the faster, more demanding, no ‘job for life’ nature of the ‘flexible economy’. Consumption - including consumption of science - far from being a democratic equivalence of citizenship, was thus seen as the historical cause of ontological insecurity.

Key Words: citizenship • GM food • media • risk biography • science

Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 2, No. 3, 363-383 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/146954050200200304


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Consumer CultureHome page
J. Connolly and A. Prothero
Green Consumption: Life-politics, risk and contradictions
Journal of Consumer Culture, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 117 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
R. Smardon
`I'd rather not take Prozac': stigma and commodification in antidepressant consumer narratives
Health (London) , January 1, 2008; 12(1): 67 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]